A judgmental analysis of linear logic

نویسندگان

  • Bor-Yuh Evan Chang
  • Kaustuv Chaudhuri
  • Frank Pfenning
چکیده

We reexamine the foundations of linear logic, developing a system of natural deduction following Martin-Löf’s separation of judgments from propositions. Our construction yields a clean and elegant formulation that accounts for a rich set of multiplicative, additive, and exponential connectives, extending dual intuitionistic linear logic but differing from both classical linear logic and Hyland and de Paiva’s full intuitionistic linear logic. We also provide a corresponding sequent calculus that admits a simple proof of the admissibility of cut by a single structural induction. Finally, we show how to interpret classical linear logic (with or without the MIX rule) in our system, employing a form of double-negation translation. This work has been supported by NSF grants CCR-9988281 and CCR-0306313. Bor-Yuh Evan Chang is currently at the University of California, Berkeley, CA and holds a California Microelectronics Fellowship.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Judgmental Deconstruction of Modal Logic

The modalities and© of necessary and lax truth described by Pfenning and Davies can be seen to arise from the same pair of adjoint logical operators F and U , which pass in both directions between two judgments of differing strength. This may be generalized to a logic with many such adjunctions, across judgments subject to different substructral disciplines, allowing explanation of possibility ...

متن کامل

A non-judgmental reconstruction of drunken logic

We investigate the extension of previous work by Krishnaswami et al. in [6] on Handwaving Logic, a logic that can be effectively modeled by Fairtlough and Mendler’s Lax Logic [4], towards trying to achieve a reasonable formalization of ”drunken logic.” More advanced formalizations of drunken logic fail to be modeled effectively by lax logic, and we argue that much more study deserves to be paid...

متن کامل

Linear Formulas in Continuous Logic

We prove that continuous sentences preserved by the ultramean construction (a generalization of the ultraproduct construction) are exactly those sentences which are approximated by linear sentences. Continuous sentences preserved by linear elementary equivalence are exactly those sentences which are approximated in the Riesz space generated by linear sentences. Also, characterizations for linea...

متن کامل

Robust Inference Policies

A series of monte carlo studies were performed to as­ sess the extent to which different inference procedures robustly output reasonable belief values in the context of increasing levels of judgmental imprecision. It was found that, when com­ pared to an equal-weights linear model, the Bayesian procedures are more likely to deduce strong support for a hypothesis. But, the Bayesian procedures ar...

متن کامل

Correct or combine ? Mechanically integrating judgmental forecasts q with statistical methods *

A laboratory experiment and two field studies were used to compare the accuracy of three methods that allow judgmental forecasts to be integrated with statistical methods. In all three studies the judgmental forecaster had exclusive access to contextual (or non time-series) information. The three methods compared were: (i) statistical correction of judgmental biases using Theil’s optimal linear...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003